<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dreamweaver CS4 vs Coda &#8211; Search Smack Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petebernardo.com/entry/dreamweaver-cs4-vs-coda-search-smack-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petebernardo.com/entry/dreamweaver-cs4-vs-coda-search-smack-down/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:33:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: One more for Coda &#171; Frontier Label Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.petebernardo.com/entry/dreamweaver-cs4-vs-coda-search-smack-down/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>One more for Coda &#171; Frontier Label Tech Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petebernardo.com/?p=95#comment-107</guid>
		<description>[...] few months, but I&#8217;ve just started using it.&#160; It&#8217;s integrated into Spotlight which makes it pretty dang fast.     &#171; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few months, but I&#8217;ve just started using it.&nbsp; It&#8217;s integrated into Spotlight which makes it pretty dang fast.     &laquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D</title>
		<link>http://www.petebernardo.com/entry/dreamweaver-cs4-vs-coda-search-smack-down/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>John D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petebernardo.com/?p=95#comment-106</guid>
		<description>I tried out Coda about 6 months ago desperate to find an alternative to Dreamweaver but it lacked a few key features one of which was site wide search! It&#039;s great to see that they&#039;ve also added a plug-in architecture which is what gave dreamweaver its edge. I&#039;m looking forward to having a play.

Dreamweaver has frustrated me for the last 3 releases because they have done nothing to improve the app, only &#039;add&#039; supposed useful &#039;features&#039;. Simplify, simplify and simplify some more. Make things easier for developers. Don&#039;t add features thinking that you are adding &#039;value&#039;. Typical McDonalds thinking.

Rant over!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried out Coda about 6 months ago desperate to find an alternative to Dreamweaver but it lacked a few key features one of which was site wide search! It&#8217;s great to see that they&#8217;ve also added a plug-in architecture which is what gave dreamweaver its edge. I&#8217;m looking forward to having a play.</p>
<p>Dreamweaver has frustrated me for the last 3 releases because they have done nothing to improve the app, only &#8216;add&#8217; supposed useful &#8216;features&#8217;. Simplify, simplify and simplify some more. Make things easier for developers. Don&#8217;t add features thinking that you are adding &#8216;value&#8217;. Typical McDonalds thinking.</p>
<p>Rant over!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.petebernardo.com/entry/dreamweaver-cs4-vs-coda-search-smack-down/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petebernardo.com/?p=95#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Awesome, glad I could help. If you are comfortable or want to become really good at coding, Coda is the way to go on OS X. I&#039;ll highlight some more features eventually but previewing a site in Coda is also light years better than Dreamweaver.

Let me know if you have any questions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, glad I could help. If you are comfortable or want to become really good at coding, Coda is the way to go on OS X. I&#8217;ll highlight some more features eventually but previewing a site in Coda is also light years better than Dreamweaver.</p>
<p>Let me know if you have any questions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.petebernardo.com/entry/dreamweaver-cs4-vs-coda-search-smack-down/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 17:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petebernardo.com/?p=95#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Sweet... i&#039;ve been thinking about using coda instead of shelling out many many pounds on Dreamweaver cs4... You&#039;ve just made my mind up.. thanks dude!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet&#8230; i&#8217;ve been thinking about using coda instead of shelling out many many pounds on Dreamweaver cs4&#8230; You&#8217;ve just made my mind up.. thanks dude!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
